- #110
- #109
- #108
- #107
- #106
- #105
- #104
- #103
- #102
- #101
- #100
- #99
- #98
- #97
- #96
- #95
- #94
- #93
- #92
- #91
- #90
- #89
- #88
- #87
- #86
- #85
- #84
- #83
- #82
- #81
- #80
- #79
- #78
- #77
- #76
- #75
- #74
- #73
- #72
- #71
- #70
- #69
- #68
- #67
How to Manage Utility Functions
As projects expand, many common functions are scattered in different places. Therefore, I took the time to organize a unified structural rule for the team to use. Many times, our impression of these utility functions only stays at the point of extracting them to a certain folder for storage. As for how to manage or maintain these functions, there are not many thoughts, leading to many chaotic situations:
- ❌ Over-abstraction: The logic has been separated, but it seems to have little meaning, instead increasing the cost of understanding and maintenance.
- ❌ Ambiguous naming: Because they are too generic, the names are also very vague.
- ❌ God-level functions: A single function does too many things, making it difficult to maintain.
To address the above issues, I wrote a new article summarizing:
- 👉🏻 Real-world problems I encountered
- 👉🏻 Definition of utility functions
- 👉🏻 When to extract utility functions
- 👉🏻 Key points for managing utility functions
- 👉🏻 Practical examples
Actually, I have no concept of whether there are better practices, but I think that such a flexible problem will be solved effectively if the whole team has a consensus and writes it down.
- #66
- #65
- #64
- #63
- #62
- #61
- #60
- #59
- #58
- #57
- #56
- #55
- #54
- #53
- #52
- #51
- #50
- #49
- #48
- #47
- #46
- #45
- #44
- #43
- #42
- #41
- #40
- #39
- #38
- #37
- #36
- #35
- #34
- #33
- #32
- #31
- #30
- #29
- #28
- #27
- #26
- #25
- #24
- #23
- #22
- #21
- #20
- #19
- #18
- #17
- #16
- #15
- #14
- #13
- #12
- #11
- #10
- #9
- #8
- #7
- #6
- #5
- #4
- #3
- #2
- #1